Source-backed civic review

Transparency for Every Citizen.

Track public sentiment around public officials using evidence-backed posts, agreement voting, and visible moderation rather than social-media noise.

Privacy model

Public anonymity, platform accountability.

Contributors should be able to speak without exposing personal identity publicly, while the platform still maintains private verification and abuse controls.

Public-facing privacy

Posts can be shown under a display name rather than a legal identity, reducing retaliation risk for ordinary users.

Private verification

Platform verification can happen privately through email, phone, or government ID checks without exposing that information on the public profile.

Accountability controls

Private verification gives the platform a stronger basis for rate limits, moderation review, repeat-abuse handling, and appeals when needed.

Request access

Featured officials

Featured Officials

Recently added profiles using live directory data.

View all officials →

Public discussion

Trending Feedback

Using the current highest-impact recent posts instead of an unsupported standalone trend engine.

Most discussed officialsFeedback volume

Loading…

Accountability

Built for evidence-backed participation.

This section keeps the Stitch layout direction, but the copy is grounded in the behaviors the current app actually supports.

Every feedback post requires an external source URL so readers can inspect the claim directly.

Votes record agreement or disagreement instead of social popularity, keeping the signal more explicit.

Moderation status stays separate from scoring, so review actions remain visible rather than hidden in the model.